ROI Case File No.223 | 'The Mirage of North American Media Enterprise'

Chapter 1: Glorious Goals — The Divergence Between Ambition and Reality

The week following the resolution of GreenPower Europe's TOC constraint resolution case, an unexpected consultation arrived from North America. The third case of Volume XVII "The Challenge of Reproducibility" concerned serious confusion occurring within an apparently smoothly operating company.

"Detective, we are setting innovative goals that attract industry attention, but our entire organization has fallen into a state of confusion. Our goals should be clear, yet somehow no one knows what they should be doing."

StreamlineMedia North's Chief Operating Officer, Sarah Jenkins, visited 221B Baker Street with undeniable confusion. In her hands were ambitious OKR materials alongside contrasting reports showing on-site chaos.

"We are a rapidly growing company operating digital media business across North America. We have introduced the innovative goal management method OKR and are challenging ambitious goals across our organization."

StreamlineMedia North's Growth Record: - Established: 2018 (rapid growth startup) - Annual revenue: ¥65 billion (180% YoY growth) - Employee count: 2,800 (4x growth in past 2 years) - Monthly users: 12 million (largest scale in North America) - Fundraising: Cumulative ¥40 billion (Series D completed)

The numbers certainly showed a rapidly growing company. However, Sarah's expression was marked with deep anxiety.

"The problem is that the ambitious goals we set with OKRs are not translating into actual actions. Our goals should be clear and measurable, yet on-site we keep hearing 'I don't know what to do.'"

Set OKRs vs. On-site Confusion: - Set OKR count: 215 across the company - Achievement rate: Below 30% (majority unachieved) - Employee goal understanding: Only 15% "completely understand" - Daily work-OKR relevance: Only 12% answered "clear"

"We thought we were setting 'ambitious and measurable goals,' but they seem to be creating confusion rather than unleashing organizational power."

Chapter 2: Blurred Results — Unmeasurable "Success"

"Ms. Sarah, what specific OKRs are you setting?"

Holmes inquired quietly.

Sarah pulled out thick OKR materials while answering.

"We set ambitious Objectives for each department and link multiple Key Results to each. It looks like a perfect OKR structure, but..."

Typical OKR Examples:

Marketing Department OKR: - Objective: "Revolutionarily improve brand recognition" - Key Result 1: "Significantly improve brand recognition" - Key Result 2: "Maximize customer engagement" - Key Result 3: "Realize market share expansion"

Content Department OKR: - Objective: "Produce industry-highest quality content" - Key Result 1: "Dramatically improve content quality" - Key Result 2: "Achieve maximum viewer satisfaction" - Key Result 3: "Demonstrate creativity surpassing competitors"

Technology Department OKR: - Objective: "Realize next-generation platform construction" - Key Result 1: "Dramatically improve system performance" - Key Result 2: "Achieve user experience innovation" - Key Result 3: "Establish technological superiority"

I immediately noticed the fundamental problem.

"These Key Results are not 'measurable.' Expressions like 'significantly,' 'maximize,' and 'dramatically' make it impossible to judge achievement."

Sarah answered with a confused expression.

"Exactly. We prioritized being 'ambitious' but neglected being 'measurable.' As a result, no one knows whether they're succeeding or failing."

Examples of Confusion Occurring On-site:

Marketing Staff A's Testimony: "When told to 'significantly improve brand recognition,' I don't know what constitutes 'significant.' Should I increase advertising budget, do PR events, or increase SNS posts... I work every day in confusion."

Content Creator B's Testimony: "What is 'industry-highest quality'? Is it high view counts, high critic ratings, or high production costs... Without standards, I don't know which direction to put effort."

Engineer C's Testimony: "When told to 'dramatically improve system performance,' I don't know if it's response time, throughput, or availability... Without knowing priorities, everything ends up half-finished."

"Our OKRs show 'direction' but don't provide 'specific action guidelines.'"

Chapter 3: OKR Reveals the Mirage — The Phantom Named Ambiguity

⬜️ ChatGPT | Catalyst of Concepts

"When the connection between goals and results is weak, effort ends in mirages"

🟧 Claude | Alchemist of Narratives

"Great aspirations alone don't make stories. Stories move only with specific achievements"

🟦 Gemini | Compass of Logic

"OKR's essence lies in structuring dreams into actions"

The three members began analysis. Gemini deployed the correct "OKR (Objectives and Key Results)" framework on the whiteboard.

Correct OKR Structure: - Objective: Qualitative and ambitious direction - Key Result: Quantitative and measurable outcome indicators - Relationship: Objective is WHY, Key Result is WHAT

"Ms. Sarah, let's verify StreamlineMedia's OKRs using the correct framework."

StreamlineMedia OKR Problem Analysis:

Problem 1: Unmeasurable Key Results

Current Key Results vs. Correct Key Results:

Marketing Department Correction Example: - Current: "Significantly improve brand recognition" - Correct: "Increase brand recognition from 25% to 45%"

• Current: "Maximize customer engagement"
• Correct: "Increase monthly active user engagement rate from 8% to 15%"

Problem 2: Ambiguous Objectives

Current Objectives vs. Clear Objectives:

Content Department Correction Example: - Current: "Produce industry-highest quality content" - Correct: "Become the No.1 content provider chosen by viewers"

Problem 3: Organizational Hierarchy Misalignment

Current Problem Structure: - Company-wide OKR: Nonexistent (unclear top-level goals) - Department OKR: Each department sets independently (no alignment) - Individual OKR: Unclear relation to department OKRs

Claude presented shocking analysis results.

"This is serious. StreamlineMedia's OKRs lack all basic OKR principles: 'measurability,' 'alignment,' and 'focus.'"

Comparison with Correct OKRs:

Effective OKR Example from Successful Company:

Marketing Department (Excellent Company A): - Objective: "Establish top brand position in North American market" - Key Result 1: "Increase brand recognition from current 28% to 50%" - Key Result 2: "Improve customer NPS from 35 to 55" - Key Result 3: "Expand market share from 12% to 20%"

Content Department (Excellent Company A): - Objective: "Become the most beloved content platform by viewers" - Key Result 1: "Extend average viewing time from monthly 8 hours to 12 hours" - Key Result 2: "Improve content satisfaction from 4.2/5 to 4.7/5" - Key Result 3: "Expand original content viewing ratio from 30% to 60%"

Critical Differences with StreamlineMedia: - Measurability: Specific numbers vs. vague expressions - Alignment: Company→Department→Individual consistency vs. scattered goals - Focus: Important 3-5 items vs. 215 scattered items

Most Serious Problem: "Wish List Disguised as OKRs"

StreamlineMedia's OKRs were actually "wish lists" rather than true OKRs. This cannot focus organizational power and instead creates dispersion and confusion.

Chapter 4: Wandering Organization — Voyage Without Goals

Detailed OKR analysis and employee interviews revealed StreamlineMedia's fundamental organizational management problems.

Negative Impact of "Mirage OKRs" on Organization:

Problem 1: Decision-Making Paralysis

Ambiguous Key Results made daily judgment criteria unclear, paralyzing decision-making.

Specific Examples: - Project prioritization: "Everything important" - cannot decide - Budget allocation: "Everything important" - dispersed investment - Personnel placement: "What criteria for placement" - unclear

Problem 2: Effort Dispersion and Waste

215 OKRs dispersed organizational power, resulting in everything being half-finished.

Dispersion Reality: - Marketing budget: Divided into 30 measures (effect measurement difficult) - Development resources: Dispersed across 45 feature improvements (unclear priorities) - Personnel placement: "Equally" allocated to all OKRs (lack of focus)

Problem 3: Motivation Decline

Ambiguous achievement criteria prevented success experiences, continuously declining motivation.

Employee Satisfaction Survey Results: - "Can feel work results": 18% (industry average 65%) - "Goals are clear": 12% (industry average 78%) - "Feel growth": 22% (industry average 58%)

Problem 4: Organizational Learning Hindrance

Unclear success and failure definitions prevented organizational learning and improvement.

Learning Hindrance Reality: - Success factor identification: Difficult (unclear what constitutes success) - Failure cause analysis: Meaningless (ambiguous failure definition) - Best practices: Cannot share (no evaluation criteria)

Comparison with Competitors:

Effective OKR Operating Company B: - OKR count: 15 company-wide (focus and selection) - Achievement rate: 70% (challenging but realistic) - Employee understanding: "Complete understanding" 85% - Daily work relevance: "Clear" 92%

Company B's Success Factors: - Simple and measurable Key Results - Clear hierarchical structure: Company→Department→Individual - Quarterly review and learning cycles - Exemplary OKR practice by management

StreamlineMedia's Current State: - OKR count: 215 (dispersion and confusion) - Achievement rate: 30% (measurement itself difficult) - Employee understanding: "Complete understanding" 15% - Daily work relevance: "Clear" 12%

Sarah became serious.

"We prioritized being 'ambitious' but neglected being 'executable.' As a result, our entire organization became lost."

Chapter 5: Detective's OKR Diagnosis — Beyond Mirages

Holmes summarized the comprehensive analysis.

"Ms. Sarah, OKR's essence is 'balance between ambition and reality.' Goals that are too ambitious to be measurable cause organizational confusion. Conversely, goals that are too realistic without challenge hinder growth. True OKRs achieve this delicate balance."

OKR Reconstruction Strategy: From "Mirage" to "Reality"

Basic Policy: Simple, Measurable, Aligned

Phase 1: OKR Reset and Reconstruction (1 month)

Step 1: Complete Halt of Current OKRs - Temporarily stop all 215 OKRs - Resolve confusion and reset organization - Company-wide training for correct OKR understanding

Step 2: Clarify Company-wide OKRs - Company Objective: "Become North America's most beloved media platform" - Company Key Result 1: "Expand monthly active users from 12 million to 20 million" - Company Key Result 2: "Improve user satisfaction (NPS) from 35 to 60" - Company Key Result 3: "Grow annual revenue from ¥65 billion to ¥100 billion"

Step 3: Design Department OKRs (Complete alignment with Company OKRs)

Marketing Department OKR: - Objective: "Accelerate user acquisition through brand power" - Key Result 1: "Expand new user acquisition from monthly 500,000 to 1.2 million" - Key Result 2: "Improve brand recognition from 28% to 45%" - Key Result 3: "Reduce customer acquisition cost by 30% (efficiency)"

Content Department OKR: - Objective: "Create content that captivates viewers" - Key Result 1: "Extend average viewing time from monthly 8 hours to 15 hours" - Key Result 2: "Improve content satisfaction from 4.1/5 to 4.6/5" - Key Result 3: "Expand original content ratio from 25% to 55%"

Phase 2: Execution and Monitoring System (Ongoing)

Monthly Review System: - Company-wide OKR progress visualization dashboard - Department progress reports and improvement actions - Early detection and countermeasures for obstacles - Company-wide sharing of success cases

Quarterly Retrospectives: - Detailed analysis of OKR achievement levels - Identification of success and failure factors - Adjustment and improvement of next quarter OKRs - Promotion of organizational learning

Phase 3: OKR Culture Establishment (6 months)

OKR Coaching System: - Deploy OKR coaches in each department - Ensure alignment between individual and department OKRs - Clarify relationship between daily work and OKRs - Continuous skill improvement support

Expected Effects: - OKR understanding: 15% → 80%+ - Achievement rate: 30% → 70% approximately (appropriate challenge level) - Employee satisfaction: +50% improvement - Organizational focus: Significant improvement

"The key is that OKR is not a 'goal-setting tool' but an 'organizational transformation tool.' Properly operated OKRs direct the entire organization in the same direction and directly connect individual efforts to organizational results."

Chapter 6: Transformation to Reality — The Emergence of Clear Pathways

Ten months later, a report arrived from StreamlineMedia North.

Results of Organizational Transformation through OKR Reconstruction:

Improved Organizational Focus: - OKR count: 215 → 15 (93% reduction) - Achievement rate: 30% → 73% (appropriate challenge level) - Employee OKR understanding: 15% → 87% - Daily work-OKR relationship: 12% → 89%

Business Performance Improvement: - Monthly active users: 12 million → 18.5 million (93% of target achieved) - User satisfaction (NPS): 35 → 56 (93% of target achieved) - Annual revenue: ¥65 billion → ¥92 billion (92% of target achieved) - Overall organizational productivity: +65% improvement

Organizational Culture Transformation: - Employee satisfaction: +58% improvement - "Feel work results": 18% → 76% - "Goals are clear": 12% → 84% - "Feel growth": 22% → 71%

Decision-Making Improvement: - Project prioritization: Quick decisions with clear criteria - Budget allocation: Strategic allocation based on OKRs - Personnel placement: Concentrated placement according to importance - Daily work: Clear purpose linked to all OKRs

Promotion of Organizational Learning: - Success factor identification: Data-based analysis possible - Failure cause analysis: Clear criteria for improvement plan formulation - Best practices: Sharing with quantitative effect measurement - Continuous improvement: Quarterly learning cycle establishment

Creation of New Growth: - Innovation creation: Improved creativity through clear goals - Inter-team collaboration: Cooperation system through shared OKRs - Individual growth: Capability development through clear goals - Competitive advantage: Differentiation through organizational focus

Sarah's letter contained deep gratitude and learning:

"Through OKR reconstruction, we transformed from 'goal mirages' to 'execution reality.' Most important was understanding that being ambitious and being measurable can coexist. Clear and measurable goals allow the entire organization to move in the same direction, directly connecting individual efforts to organizational results. Now all employees can feel their contributions and are full of motivation for growth. OKR is not just a goal-setting tool but a powerful weapon for organizational transformation."

Detective's Perspective — The Power of Clarity

That night, I contemplated the essence of goal management.

StreamlineMedia's case clearly demonstrated the "goal-setting trap" that modern companies often fall into. The balance between being ambitious and being measurable. Achieving this delicate balance is the key to truly effective goal management.

OKR's true value lies not in being merely a goal-setting tool but in being an "organizational transformation tool" that concentrates organizational power on a single point. Ambiguous goals disperse organizations, while clear goals integrate them.

In the context of Volume XVII "The Challenge of Reproducibility," StreamlineMedia's transformation provided important insights. To generate reproducible results, we must first clearly define what constitutes results. What cannot be measured cannot be improved, and what cannot be improved cannot be reproduced.

"Clarity is the most powerful weapon an organization possesses"

Through the OKR method, StreamlineMedia was able to unleash the organization's potential. The next case will also explore factors that hinder reproducibility and their solutions.

"Goals are not dreams. Goals are pathways to reality. The clearer that pathway, the more the organization can advance without hesitation." — From the Detective's Notes

Related files