ROI【🔏Classified File】 No. X037 | What is Realization First Principle

---

Detective's Memo: The revolutionary action principle "Realization First Principle" extracted by ROI Detective Agency from field practice. While many pursue "efficient methods," "smart approaches," and "best practices," why does this methodology fearlessly execute "100 copy-pastes" and "1000 manual tasks" without being deterred by inefficiency? Why does the method ridiculed as "idiotic" by perfectionists share the same success pattern as the founding periods of global companies like Amazon, Airbnb, and Groupon? Choosing "realizable inefficient methods" over "unrealizable perfect plans"—uncover the secret of practitioners that creates the decisive difference between doers and critics, avoiding the trap of methodology obsession and reliably reaching goals through this paradoxical thinking.

What is Realization First Principle - Case Overview

Realization First Principle, officially the "incremental goal achievement methodology prioritizing realizability over efficiency," is an original action theory systematized by ROI Detective Agency from practical experience. Composed of five stages—"Goal Setting → Complete Task Enumeration → Manual Full Realization → Bottleneck Identification → Selective Automation"—it is recognized among clients as a methodology that absolutely prioritizes "first realize" while completely ignoring the beauty, efficiency, and smartness of methods. However, many people dismiss it as "inefficient folly," failing to understand its original strategic value of liberation from perfectionism and analysis paralysis, and reliable goal achievement.

Investigation Memo: Why is "100 copy-pastes" a rational decision? The answer lies in the cold comparison of "learning cost vs. realization speed." If 30 minutes of copy-paste is faster and more reliable than 3 hours of learning for-loops, then copy-paste is the optimal solution. Realization First Principle is the ultimate pragmatism that thoroughly implements MVP's "minimum" concept at the action level.

Basic Structure of Realization First Principle - Evidence Analysis

Basic Evidence: Reliable goal achievement system through 5 stages

Step 1: Final Goal Setting (Vision Setting)

Clarifying only "what to achieve"

Goal setting principles: - Completely ignore implementation methods - Never think about "how to" - Postpone detailed specifications, technology, resources - Vividly depict only the state to achieve

Bad example (includes method): "Create a blog with 100,000 monthly PV using WordPress" → Already decided on WordPress as the method

Good example (pure goal): "Have an information publishing media with 100,000 monthly PV" → WordPress, custom system, note, etc. methods undecided

ROI Detective Agency example: Goal: "Have media that systematically publishes business frameworks" Method: Undecided (eventually settled on ChatGPT-made Markdown Viewer)

Step 2: Complete Task Enumeration (Complete Task Mapping)

Writing out all processes "ignoring feasibility"

Task enumeration principles: - Don't consider whether it can or cannot be done - Don't worry about having knowledge or not - Ignore whether cost is high or low - Just list all necessary processes

Enumeration example (ROI Detective Agency case):

Goal: Business framework publishing media

Necessary tasks (method irrelevant):
- Write articles
- Create site to display articles
- Make viewable on internet
- Increase articles
- Be found by readers
- Know reader reactions
- Monetize
- Improve article quality
- Update continuously

At this point, never think about "how to"

Important discovery: Even if there are tasks you think "impossible" at this stage, no problem. Because next step will "realize by any method."

Step 3: Manual Full Realization (Manual Full Realization)

Achieving goals with "zero systemization" and "zero efficiency"

Absolute principle of realization:

If can't automate with programming → Do manually
If can't do manually → Do everything with manpower
If can't do with manpower → Outsource
If can't outsource → Find another method

"Cannot" doesn't exist.
Only "cannot with this method" exists.

Concrete realization examples:

Programming case:

Don't know for-loop → Copy-paste 100 times
Don't know copy-paste → Type manually 100 times
Typing is slow → Take time and type 100 times
Can't use keyboard → Use voice input

Site construction case:

Can't create custom system → Use WordPress
WordPress too difficult → Use note
Don't understand note → Write in Google Docs and publish
Even that impossible → Scan handwriting and distribute as PDF

ROI Detective Agency example:

Can't build advanced CMS → Request ChatGPT to create Markdown Viewer
No article management system → Manually create Markdown files ×200
No auto-publication system → Manually upload one by one
No automatic image placement → Manually place 200 images
No automatic metadata generation → Manually input 200 times

Important insight: Even if told "That's idiotic," those who realize win. Critics have realized nothing.

Step 4: Bottleneck Identification and Reduction (Bottleneck Identification)

Streamlining only "actually time-consuming parts"

Bottleneck discovery principles: - Judge from actual experience, not speculation - Can accurately identify because ran everything manually - Specify only truly time-consuming parts - Leave everything else alone (no efficiency needed)

Discovery through actual experience:

Expectation: Article creation most difficult
Reality: Article creation becomes fast with practice
         Metadata input abnormally tedious

Expectation: System construction biggest barrier
Reality: Solved by asking ChatGPT
         Manual upload also within acceptable range

ROI Detective Agency example:

Result of manually creating and publishing 200 articles:

Time-consuming but acceptable:
- Article writing (2-3 hours per article)
- Image placement (5 minutes per article)

Clearly inefficient:
- Manual sitemap.xml update (30 minutes each time)
- Manual weekly ranking aggregation (1 hour per week)
- Duplicate metadata input (10 minutes per article)

→ Target only these 3 for efficiency

Important decision not to systemize:

Article writing automation → Unnecessary (quality priority)
Image creation automation → Unnecessary (effort acceptable)
Unified thumbnail design → Unnecessary (diversity is value)

Step 5: Selective Automation (Selective Automation)

Automating only "repeatedly occurring tasks"

Automation decision criteria:

IF (task occurs every time) AND (high burden)
THEN Consider automation

ELSE Maintain manual work

Automation priorities: 1. Daily occurrence × High load → Highest priority 2. Weekly occurrence × High load → Priority 3. Monthly occurrence × High load → Consider 4. Occasional occurrence × High load → Maintain manual 5. Daily occurrence × Low load → Manual acceptable

ROI Detective Agency implementation:

Phase 1 implementation (3 days development):
- sitemap.xml automatic generation
Effect: 30-minute task becomes 0 minutes

Phase 2 implementation (5 days development):
- Weekly ranking auto-display via GA4 integration
Effect: 1-hour weekly task becomes 0 minutes

Phase 3 implementation (2 days development):
- OGP auto-setting, metadata templating
Effect: 10-minute per article task becomes 1 minute

Phase 4 implementation consideration → Rejected:
- Article writing automation → Rejected for quality maintenance
- AI summary function → Rejected due to unclear demand

Important discovery: No need to systemize everything. Parts that are fine with manual work can remain manual forever.

Evidence Analysis: The innovation of Realization First Principle lies in avoiding perfectionism and analysis paralysis by prioritizing "realization even if inefficient" rather than "searching for efficient methods," reliably reaching goals.

Realization First Implementation Procedures - Investigation Methods

Investigation Finding 1: Amazon's Founding Period Realization First Practice

Case evidence (inefficient beginning of world's largest EC company):

1994 Jeff Bezos's Garage Startup

Goal setting: "Sell books on the internet" Method: Nothing decided

Complete task enumeration: - Hold book inventory - Receive orders - Package books - Ship - Accept payment

Manual full realization:

Inventory system: - Advanced inventory management system → None - Warehouse → None - Actual method → Go buy at bookstore when order comes

Order system: - Web system → Rudimentary - Order management → Manual Excel input - Inventory check → Call bookstore

Packaging and shipping: - Automatic packaging system → None - Distribution center → None - Actual method → Jeff himself packages manually on floor on knees

"That's idiotic" criticism: "Build warehouse system from start" "Inventory management system essential" "Contract with distribution center"

Jeff's decision: "First realize. Efficiency later."

Bottleneck identification: - After actually operating several months - Going to bookstore reached limit - Manual packaging also reached limit

Selective automation: - Warehouse contract - Inventory management system introduction - Distribution center establishment

Result: Growth to world's largest EC company

Evidence Analysis: Even Amazon started with ultra-inefficient "go buy when order comes."

Investigation Finding 2: Airbnb's Founding Period Manual Practice

Case evidence ($31B company's manual operation start):

2007 San Francisco Apartment

Goal setting: "Receive guests in spare room and earn income"

Complete task enumeration: - List room - Receive reservations - Welcome guests - Clean room - Receive payment

Manual full realization:

Listing system: - Advanced reservation site → None - Professional photos → None - Actual method → Shot with own camera, simple site listing

Reservation system: - Automatic reservation system → None - Payment system → None - Actual method → Accept reservations via email, cash payment

Operation: - Cleaning service → None - Key exchange system → None - Actual method → Founders themselves welcome, clean themselves

First guests: 3 guests in founders' apartment Laid air mattress, provided handmade breakfast All handled manually by founders

"That's idiotic" criticism: "Build hotel reservation system from start" "Payment system essential" "Contract with cleaning company"

Founders' decision: "First prove in own apartment" "System after confirming demand"

Bottleneck identification: - After operating dozens manually - Email reservation effort - Payment complications - Cleaning arrangement burden

Selective automation: - Web reservation system construction - Online payment introduction - Cleaning partner contract - Gradual platformization

Result: World's largest vacation rental platform

Investigation Finding 3: ROI Detective Agency Complete Practice Record

Case evidence (inefficient journey to 200 articles):

April 23, 2025 Markdown Viewer Published

Goal setting: "Have media that systematically publishes business frameworks"

Complete task enumeration:

- Create site
- Write articles
- Publish
- Gather readers
- Monetize
- Improve

Manual full realization:

Phase 1: Minimum System (2025/04/23-25)

Site construction:
- Advanced CMS → None
- Database → None
- Actual method → Request ChatGPT to create Markdown Viewer in 3 hours

Article creation:
- Article generation AI → None
- CMS editor → None
- Actual method → Manual writing in text editor

Publishing:
- Auto-publication system → None
- Actual method → Manual file upload

Result: Started publishing with 5 articles

Phase 2: Manual Expansion (2025/04-06)

All manual until 30 articles:
- Manual article file creation ×30
- Manual image placement ×30
- Manual metadata input ×30
- Manual sitemap.xml update ×30 times
- Manual OGP setting creation ×30

Total work time: Approximately 100 hours
Efficient? → No
Realized? → Yes

Phase 3: Bottleneck Discovery (2025/06)

Actual experience at 50 articles:
- Article writing (2-3 hours per article) → Acceptable
- Image creation (30 minutes per article) → Acceptable
- sitemap update (30 minutes each time) → **Painful**
- Ranking aggregation (1 hour weekly) → **Painful**
- Metadata input (10 minutes per article) → **Annoying**

Clear efficiency targets identified

Phase 4: Selective Systemization (2025/06-07)

Implemented efficiencies:
✅ sitemap.xml auto-generation (2025/06/04)
✅ GA4 integration auto-ranking display (2025/06/14)
✅ OGP templating (2025/06/25)

Unimplemented efficiencies:
❌ AI article generation → For quality maintenance
❌ Automatic image generation → For diversity maintenance
❌ Full CMS → For Markdown flexibility maintenance

Phase 5: Continuous Realization (2025/07-09)

200 articles achieved (2025/09/17):
- Article writing → Continue manual
- Image creation → Continue manual
- System parts → Maintain automation

Balanced efficiency and quality with hybrid approach

Final results: - 200 articles published - Google Adsense monthly ¥1,000 achieved - 2 Kindle books published - Weekly 2,000 PV achieved

Response to "That's idiotic" criticism: "Critics have realized nothing. We have realized."

Power of Realization First Principle - Hidden Truth

Warning File 1: Complete Liberation from Perfectionism and Analysis Paralysis

While others continue searching for "optimal methods" and start nothing, those who realize even inefficiently gain overwhelming advantage. Perfect plans don't realize, but imperfect execution surely progresses.

Warning File 2: Dramatic Reduction of Learning Cost

Eliminates pre-learning based on "might need someday." Learning only when actually needed zeros out wasted learning time. If 30 minutes copy-paste > 3 hours learning for-loop, choosing copy-paste is rational.

Warning File 3: Minimizing Failure Cost and Time

Manual realization loses only time if fails. System development loses development cost too. Implements MVP's "minimum" principle at action level.

Warning File 4: Accurate Identification of True Bottlenecks

Identifying efficiency targets from actual experience rather than speculation avoids unnecessary systemization. Implementing only truly necessary efficiency maximizes ROI.

Limitations and Precautions of Realization First Principle - Potential Dangers

Warning File 1: Scale Expansion Limit Risk

Biggest challenge. Methods started manually inevitably reach scale limits. Amazon and Airbnb also needed warehouses and systemization. Transformation decision and investment judgment at expansion timing determines success.

Warning File 2: Quality Degradation and Increased Error Risk

Manual repetition risks human errors and quality variation. Especially as it increases to 100, 1000 times, error probability also increases. Parallel implementation of checking system and quality management necessary.

Warning File 3: Habituation of Inefficiency and Resistance to Improvement

Risk of missing efficiency timing by becoming too accustomed to manual work. "Because we've been doing it this way" thinking risks hindering necessary transformation. Regular review and judgment important.

Warning File 4: Lack of Reproducibility During Team Expansion

Methods realized through individual manual work are difficult to transfer and educate to others. Documentation, standardization, and systemization become essential at team and organization stages.

Warning File 5: End-in-Itself from "Glorification of Inefficiency"

Risk of misunderstanding Realization First Principle and thinking "inefficiency is virtue." Principle is not "inefficiency is good" but "realize first, efficiency later." Not efficiency denial but priority issue.

Application of Realization First Principle and Related Methods - Related Case Files

Related Evidence 1: Perfect Alignment with MVP

Minimum Viable Product × Realization First: - MVP: Market launch with minimum features - Realization First: Realize even with manual work

Integrated approach: - Goal setting → MVP hypothesis setting - Manual realization → MVP construction - Bottleneck identification → Measurement and learning - Selective automation → Improvement and scaling

Concretizing MVP to "action principle" level

Related Evidence 2: Integration with Scene-Cast Theory

Environmental design × Realization First: - Scene → Goal of each phase - Cast → Incremental casting of manual work, tools, systems - Manual work phase → Minimum cast - Efficiency phase → Adding new cast called system

Common philosophy of "realization on limited stage"

Related Evidence 3: Integration with PDCA Cycle

Continuous improvement × Realization First: - Plan → Goal setting and task enumeration - Do → Manual full realization - Check → Bottleneck identification - Act → Selective automation

Realization First accelerates PDCA's "Do"

Related Evidence 4: Record Utilization with RCD Model

Learning system × Realization First: - Record → Record manual work time and effort - Check → Discover true bottlenecks from records - Do → Accurate identification of efficiency targets

RCD for effect measurement and improvement of Realization First

Related Evidence 5: Deep Dive with 5 Whys

Root cause analysis × Realization First: - Why manual work needed? → Lack of system knowledge - Why lack knowledge? → No learning time - Why no time? → Because prioritized realization - Why prioritize realization? → Validation first, efficiency later - True reason → Uncertainty reduction is top priority

Proving rationality of Realization First through deep dive

Industry-Specific Realization First Cases - Special Evidence

Related Evidence 6: Groupon (Group Purchase Coupons)

WordPress manual operation:

Goal: Region-limited coupon business Manual realization: - Manual posting to WordPress blog - Manual PDF coupon creation - Manual email sending - Manual Excel management

"That's idiotic": "Build system from start"

Result: Growth to global company

Lesson: Market validation possible even manually

Related Evidence 7: Zappos (Online Shoe Sales)

No-inventory sales:

Goal: Online shoe sales Manual realization: - Photograph shoes from physical stores - Go buy after orders received - Manual packaging and shipping

"That's idiotic": "Hold inventory, build warehouse"

Result: Great success with Amazon acquisition

Lesson: Demand validation before inefficiency

Related Evidence 8: Buffer (SNS Scheduled Posting)

Two-page site:

Goal: SNS scheduled posting tool Manual realization: - No product, explanation page only - Price page only - Zero implementation

"That's idiotic": "Build product before selling"

Result: Development after demand confirmation, success

Lesson: Demand validation before product possible

Realization First vs Traditional Approach - Comparative Analysis

Related Evidence 9: Fundamental Paradigm Differences

Traditional approach vs Realization First:

Planning stage: - Traditional: Research and consider optimal methods (weeks to months) - Realization First: Decide only goal and execute immediately (same day)

Execution stage: - Traditional: Build efficient systems and tools (months) - Realization First: Realize with manual work and copy-paste (days to weeks)

Completeness: - Traditional: Aim for perfection - Realization First: Working is enough

When failing: - Traditional: Large investment loss - Realization First: Only time loss

Efficiency: - Traditional: Efficiency emphasis from start - Realization First: Implement after confirming necessity

Learning: - Traditional: Pre-learning required - Realization First: Learn when needed

Results: - Traditional: High quality but incomplete (perfectionism trap) - Realization First: Low quality but complete (realization priority)

Mathematical Proof of "100 Copy-Pastes" Rationality - Quantitative Analysis

Related Evidence 10: Rigorous Cost Comparison

Strict comparison of time and learning costs:

Scenario: Need to process 100 similar data items

Method A: Learn for-loop and program

For-loop learning time: 30 minutes to 1 hour
Implementation time: 30 minutes to 1 hour
Debug time: 30 minutes to 2 hours
Operation check: 10 minutes
---
Total: 2 to 4.5 hours

Method B: Execute 100 times with copy-paste

1 copy-paste: 10 seconds
100 repetitions: 17 minutes
Operation check: 10 minutes
---
Total: 27 minutes

Method C: Manual typing 100 times

1 typing: 1 minute
100 repetitions: 100 minutes
Operation check: 10 minutes
---
Total: 110 minutes (1 hour 50 minutes)

Conclusion: Copy-paste (27 min) < Manual (110 min) < Program (120-270 min)

Learning for-loop is most time-consuming option

Further important discovery:

If task ends in 100 times:
→ Copy-paste is optimal

If 1000 times needed:
→ Only then learn for-loop
→ Learning cost has value at 1000 times point

If 10000 times needed:
→ Consider more advanced automation

Economic principle of Realization First: Don't invest until necessity proven = Minimum risk

Organizational Strategy for Realization First Introduction - Special Investigation

Related Evidence 11: Implementation at Organization Level

Introduction at individual, team, and organizational levels:

Individual Level Practice (Can start same day):

Mindset transformation: - "Perfect method" → "Realizing method" - "Efficiency" → "Realizability" - "After learning" → "Learn after realizing" - "Don't want to be ridiculed" → "Realization is everything"

Practice procedure: 1. Set one goal to achieve today 2. Write out all tasks without thinking about methods 3. Realize with easiest method (ignore efficiency) 4. Note time-consuming parts 5. Next time improve only those parts

Team Level Practice (Start in 1 week):

Culture cultivation: - "Those who realize are right" culture - Culture praising "idiotic methods" - Tolerance of failure and inefficiency - Elimination of perfectionism

Practice process:

Week 1: Team goal setting and manual realization
- Everyone experiences goal achievement with manual work
- Don't evaluate efficiency at all
- Evaluate only fact of realization

Week 2-4: Share bottlenecks and improve
- Each shares "time-consuming parts"
- Identify common bottlenecks
- Consider team-wide efficiency

Organization Level Practice (Establish in 3 months):

Organizational transformation program:

Phase 1: Gain management understanding (1 month) - Share Amazon and Airbnb cases - Historical proof of "inefficient success" - Explain economic rationality of Realization First introduction

Phase 2: Pilot project (1 month) - Practice in 3-5 teams - Accumulate manual realization success cases - Quantitatively measure efficiency ROI

Phase 3: Company-wide deployment (1 month) - Share success cases company-wide - Permeate Realization First culture - Reflect in evaluation system (emphasize realization)

Success factors: - Top's "Realize even with idiotic methods" message - Temporary suspension of efficiency evaluation - Maximum evaluation of realization fact - Reduced influence of perfectionists

Psychological Foundation of Realization First - Deep Analysis

Related Evidence 12: Cognitive Science and Behavioral Economics Basis

Relationship with human cognitive biases:

Perfectionism Bias: - Procrastinate action seeking perfect method - Realization First nullifies this - "Action even if imperfect" is solution

Analysis Paralysis: - Excessive analysis and planning make action impossible - Realization First skips analysis - "Realize rather than think" is prescription

Sunk Cost Fallacy: - Manual realization loses only time - System development failure loses investment too - Design tolerating small failures

Immediate Reward Bias: - Manual realization shows results immediately - Learning and development delay results - Optimized for human motivation

Implementation Intention Theory: - Pre-setting "If ○○ then △△" - Realization First provides clear action guidelines - Reduces decision-making cost

Neuroscience explanation: - Activation of dopamine reward system - Accumulation of small success experiences - Improved self-efficacy through realization - Habituation of continuous action

Realization First Success Indicators and Measurement - Evaluation System

Related Evidence 13: Effect Measurement Framework

Quantitative evaluation of Realization First success:

Realization speed indicators: - Time from goal setting to initial realization - Time comparison with traditional methods - Goal achievement rate (realized vs unrealized)

Learning efficiency indicators: - Time reduced from unnecessary pre-learning - Time only for actually needed learning - Learning ROI (learning time / usage frequency)

Investment efficiency indicators: - Manual realization cost vs system development cost - Loss comparison when failing - Cumulative savings from incremental investment

Bottleneck accuracy indicators: - Efficiency by speculation vs efficiency by actual experience - Actual effect of efficiency (time reduction rate) - Number of unnecessary systemizations avoided

Organizational culture indicators: - Penetration of Realization First thinking - Reduction of stagnation from perfectionism - Increase in "idiotic method" practitioners - Improvement in organizational average realization speed

Measurement method:

Before/after Realization First introduction:

Before introduction:
- Project start to results: Average 6 months
- Stagnation at planning stage: 40% of projects
- Incomplete seeking perfection: 25% of projects

After introduction:
- Project start to results: Average 2 months
- Stagnation at planning stage: 5% of projects
- Incomplete seeking perfection: 3% of projects

Effects:
- Realization speed: 3x improvement
- Completion rate: 72% → 92% (+28%)
- Investment efficiency: 60% reduction in unnecessary investment

Future and Evolution of Realization First - Outlook Analysis

Related Evidence 14: Acceleration through Technology Evolution

Realization First in AI era:

ChatGPT & Generative AI × Realization First: - System construction possible with zero programming knowledge - "Ask ChatGPT" is new "manual work" - Dramatic learning cost reduction accelerates realization - ROI Detective Agency example proves this

No-code & Low-code × Realization First: - Systemization without programming - Easy transition from manual work to systemization - Easy next step after "100 copy-pastes"

Automation Tools × Realization First: - Automatic recording of manual work by RPA - Automatic detection of repetitive tasks - Automation of bottleneck identification

Next-generation Realization First methods:

Traditional: Manual work → Learn programming → Systemize

AI era: Manual work → Request AI → Immediate systemization

Dramatic acceleration of realization speed:
- Markdown Viewer: 3 hours with ChatGPT
- Traditionally: Weeks to months with learning and development

Predicted changes: - Expansion of "manual work" definition (AI also type of manual work) - Further improvement in realization speed - Decreased necessity of programming learning - Democratization of Realization First thinking

Conclusion - Investigation Summary

Investigator's Final Report:

Realization First Principle is a "revolutionary action theory prioritizing realizability over efficiency." This methodology, systematized by ROI Detective Agency from practical experience, fundamentally solves the three major action inhibiting factors of modern people—perfectionism, analysis paralysis, and methodology obsession—and functions as a powerful framework realizing reliable goal achievement.

Most impressive in this investigation was the paradoxical truth that seemingly inefficient methods like "100 copy-pastes" and "1000 manual tasks" are actually the most rational choices. Faster and more reliable to realize with 30-minute copy-paste than spend 3 hours learning for-loops. Many perfectionists overlook this simple fact.

The historical fact that global companies Amazon, Airbnb, and Groupon all started with "idiotic methods" was also an important discovery. Jeff Bezos going to buy at bookstores, Airbnb founders welcoming guests themselves, Groupon manually creating PDFs—these "inefficiencies" were proven to be actually the shortest path to success.

The systematization of the 5-stage process (goal setting → task enumeration → manual realization → bottleneck identification → selective automation) was also confirmed as a noteworthy feature. Each stage is clear, has concreteness anyone can practice, and is designed with extremely high reproducibility.

The demonstrated results of achieving 200 articles at ROI Detective Agency also clearly prove the theory's effectiveness. Starting with ChatGPT-made Markdown Viewer, manually creating 200 articles, systemizing only necessary parts—this practice has become a textbook success example of Realization First Principle.

Integration possibilities with other business frameworks were also confirmed. Action-level implementation of MVP, environmental design integration with Scene-Cast Theory, improvement cycle construction with PDCA and RCD Model—Realization First functions as a foundation dramatically improving execution power of other methods.

Cognitive science and behavioral economics basis was also confirmed as important support. A method designed with deep understanding of human cognitive characteristics like perfectionism bias, analysis paralysis, and sunk cost effect—a psychologically optimized approach.

However, scale expansion limit risk also emerged as an important caution. Manual work inevitably reaches limits. Discerning transformation timing and appropriate systemization investment judgment become keys to long-term success.

Future possibilities through AI and no-code tool evolution were also confirmed. In an era where system construction can be requested from ChatGPT, the definition of "manual work" expands, further increasing Realization First's power.

Most importantly, Realization First functions beyond mere "action methodology" as "life philosophy and values." Choosing "realizable imperfect action" over "unrealizable perfect plans"—this mindset is a universal principle applicable not only to business but all aspects of life.

Only those with courage to realize even inefficiently, unafraid of "that's idiotic" criticism, grasp true success. Critics have realized nothing, but realizers are changing the world.

Maxim of realization: "Those who realize with idiotic methods always beat those who know perfect methods but haven't realized"

【ROI Detective Agency Classified File Series X037 Completed】

Case Closed